Atty. Mamyrlito Tan

Lawyer of Katrina Halili


According to Atty. Mamyrlito Tan (Katrina Halili`s lawyer) Katrina is not taking any drugs.
According to Hayden Kho Katrina is the one who brought the drugs they used before they had sex.
He said they were taking ecstasy that is why they were like bulls during their actual sex.

Trivia: MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, also known as ecstasy) is a semisynthetic member of the amphetamine class of psychoactive drugs.

The most common subjective effects reported by users include:

* Euphoria
* Decreased hostility and insecurity
* Increased feelings of intimacy with others
* Feelings of empathy towards others
* Ability to discuss anxiety-provoking topics with markedly increased ease
* A strong sense of inner peace and self-acceptance
* Feelings of insightfulness and mental clarity
* Intensification of sensory experience, particularly proprioception, hearing and touch
* Decreased appetite
* Short-term memory lapses

Attorney Lois K. Smith

Lois K. Smith

PARALEGAL
phone: 585-231-1146
fax: 585-232-2152
location: Rochester
email: lsmith@hselaw.com
PRACTICE AREAS
Trusts & Estates

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Lois Smith has been a paralegal at Harter Secrest & Emery since 1975, specializing in estate and trust administration. She assists in the preparation of estate and gift tax returns as well as fiduciary and individual income tax returns. She is also involved in estate and tax planning.

EDUCATION
Institute for Paralegal Training, Philadelphia, PA, Trusts & Estates Certificate, 1974
Bowling Green State University, B.A., 1971

PROFESSIONAL AND CIVIC ACTIVITIES
Founding Member, Paralegal Association of Rochester, Inc.
Former Vice President, Newsletter Committee, Paralegal Association of Rochester
Former Vice President, Membership Committee, Paralegal Association of Rochester
Former Chair, Trusts & Estates Section, Paralegal Association of Rochester, Inc.
Former Chair, Administrative Board, Faith Lutheran Church
Participant, Lawyers for Learning, School 29

Legal Advice

Legal Advice is

Finding a lawyer is not that easy.Sometimes it`s intimidating and you`ll never know where and how to seek help.Attorneys are too expensive but if you know how and where to look public attorneys you will be able to get Legal Advice depending to your case.If you don`t wish to put out any amount of money you should seek for Legal Advice.Here are some tips on How to find free Outstanding advice but unbeatable price:

1.Search for free legal advice in the web, there`s a lot of Law Gurus.

2.Inquire to an attorney by emailing him or better if you can get his contact number ask him directly regarding your concern.

3.World Law Direct, is a great forum to seek for help.

4.Ask a free consultation with a lawyer.They give advices.

5.If you have no internet connection,there are books you can use for reference.Make Library a tool for your inquiries.Research !

If you found some illegal doings report to a police immediately!

Coalition for the Deserving has launched

first photo is from Arpee Lazaro using his Sony Ericsson W760

Held at the Manila Hotel,Centennial Hall 11 am

Coalition for the Deserving has launched:

Aksyon Demokratiko,

Bigkis Pinoy,

Kilusang Bagong Lipunan,

Reporma

These are group of political parties who have gotten together and formed the coalition for the deserving.I find that there are a lot of grandstanding.

Never before in our checkered history as anew democracy in Asia have our political parties seriously considered fielding candidates who are truly deserving of the National Leadership Positions they seek.For the most part they were chosen simply on the on the basis of their entertainment skills that included singing,dancing and name acting ,glib talk and good looks.Qualifications for elective leadership was based mainly on "winability"-that is popularity and name recall,where experience ,character and ability for the job were completely irrelevant.

These gave our people in the past no choice but to elect even the most incompetent for as long as he or she was the most popular.

Let us help Gary Granada

by dosomethingworthwhile
Listen and know what really happened.
Did GMA steal his work? Is it illegal?
Songwriter and Composer, Gary Granada, was given lyrics which he was supposed to translate into music. But GMA didn`t like it so they bypassed Granada`s work but later on used it without consent.
"It would be hard to translate lyrics into music at exactly 60 seconds."-Gary Granada

Illegal ang kanilang pagde-detain sa mga bata?

'Alabang Boys' camp to file habeas corpus before CA

01/05/2009 | 12 NN

MANILA, Philippines – The camp of the so-called “Alabang Boys" will challenge before the Court of Appeals (CA) the legality of the Philippine Anti-Drug Enforcement Agency’s (PDEA) custody over Richard Brodett, Jorge Jordana Joseph, and Richard Tecson.

In an interview on dzBB radio on Monday, lawyer Felisberto Verano Jr who represents the families of the three suspects said they will file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, asking the appellate court to order the three men’s release and to declare their detention illegal.

“Ang isasampa namin ay habeas corpus which means they will have to justify the detention of the boys. Kapag hindi nila ma-eexplain ay sila mismo ay mabibilanggo (We will file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus which means they will have to justify the detention of the boys. If they cannot do so, they themselves will be put in jail)," Verano said.

The lawyer, however, did not indicate when they will file the petition.

Verano’s camp also filed before the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) their affidavit and arbitrary detention charges against PDEA, along with two other charges and a possible libel charge.

“Illegal ang kanilang pagde-detain sa mga bata, may libel din at isa at dalawang kaso pa (They illegally detained the boys)," Verano said without elaborating.

On Sept. 20, Brodett and Joseph were arrested in PDEA’s buy-bust operations in Ayala Alabang in Muntinlupa City. Tecson was arrested during follow-up operations four hours later in Cubao, Quezon City.

The three were held for supposedly peddling high-end drugs, like ecstacy, cocaine, and marijuana.

But a separate radio report quoted Verano as saying that the men’s arrest were also illegal, saying that there were no buy-bust operations and that the drugs were only recovered a few hours after their arrest.

Quoting Verano, the report also said that Brodett had been mauled by PDEA agents inside his detention cell. The report said the Brodett family presented before the NBI photos of Brodett’s bruises he sustained during his detention.

In the dzBB interview, Verano also denied the families of Brodett, Joseph, and Tecson pulled connections and attempted to pay off some P50 million for Justice Department (DOJ) prosecutors to recommend the dismissal of the drug-related case against the three men and to order their release from PDEA’s custody.

“Yung P50 million, alam mo napakalaking halagang iyan. Mayroon bang family na makakaproduce ng P50 million? Kahit yung mga ultra rich na families natin hindi eh (Fifty million is too high for any family to come up with such amount. Can any family produce it? Even ultra-rich families cannot)," Verano said.

Meanwhile, radio dzBB’s Carlo Mateo reported that the NBI special task force looking into the alleged bribe attempt started Monday and will be spearheaded by head agent Arnel Dalumpines.

In another dzBB interview, Dalumpines said the special panel will only look into the alleged bribe try and not on the merits of the drug case against Brodett, Joseph, and Tecson.

Dalumpines added that the task force will not also touch on the legality of PDEA’s arrest and detention of the three men.

“Sa amin kasi yung sa bribery lang na yan, yung merit ng kaso di na sa amin yan (We will only look into the purported bribe attempts and not into the merits of the drug case against the three men)," Dalumpines said. - Sophia Dedace, GMANews.TV

Pagkumpiska sa mga illegal na paputok, paigtingin sana

TAUN-TAON, sinasabi ng Philippine National Police (PNP) na paiigtingin nila ang pagkumpiska sa mga illegal at delikadong paputok na ibinibenta sa kalye. Naglalabas din sila ng mga listahan ng mga bawal na paputok. Sabi ng PNP hindi sila mangingimi sa pag-raid sa mga tindahan na may mga illegal at delikadong paputok. Ito ayon sa PNP ay para masi­guro na hindi makakabili ang mamamayan ng mga paputok na delikado. Karaniwan nang ang mga papu­tok na tinda sa kalye ay walang kalidad kaya kapaha­makan ang kinahahantungan ng mga nagpapaputok. Marami nang naputulan ng daliri, nabulag, nalapnos ang mukha at katawan at higit sa lahat nagdudulot ng sunog na tumupok sa maraming ari-arian.

Ngayon ay panibagong babala na naman ang sinabi ng PNP sa mga magtitinda ng illegal na papu­tok, hindi sila titigil hangga’t hindi nakukumpiska ang mga ito. Inilabas ng PNP ang listahan ng mga bawal na paputok at ito ay ang mga sumusunod: Atomic Bomb, Bawang (malaki), Giant Whistle, Judas Belt (malaki), Kwiton, Lolo Thunder, Og, Plapla at Watusi. Ang mga paputok na ito ay lubhang delikado at maa­aring mapahamak ang masabugan.

Subalit ang babala ng PNP ay tila naman hindi nakapagdulot ng nerbiyos sa mga pasaway na store owner at vendor na lalo pang inilaladlad ang kanilang mga paputok na karamihan ay ang mga illegal. Tila ba ang babala ng PNP ay nagdaan lang sa kanang taynga at walang anumang lumabas sa kabila. Naiisip siguro nila na maaaring “lagyan” ang mga pulis sakali man at sila’y mahuli. Makakaya nilang lusutan dahil “pera-pera” lang ang lakad ng mga parak.

Kaya hindi nakapagtataka na sa kabila na pinag­babawal ang mga paputok ay bakit marami pa rin ang nakabibili nito. Bakit patuloy ang pagpapaputok sa mga kalsada ng mga bawal na plapla, Judas Belt at Atomic Bomb? Nakalulusot sa mga pulis o hinahayaan dahil nga mayroong lagay. Hindi sana pawang babala lang at pananakot ang PNP sa panahong ito. Aksiyon ang kailangan para ang mga delikadong paputok ay hindi mapasakamay ng mamamayan na magdudulot naman ng kapaha­makan. Mas magandang makita na sa January 1, 2009 ay buo pa ang mga daliri.

public nudity! is it illegal ?

In 1992 New York State’s highest court ruled that it was legal for a woman to go into public without covering her breasts. Many people have derided that decision — most calling it immoral — and by most moral standards they are probably right. In most places in the world, covering your body is considered as important, if not more important, than cleaning your body. So in New York, in spite of a law that allows it, the overwhelming majority of women do not bare their breasts in public. Why? Two reasons: The main reason is because women have been taught since childhood that exposing their breasts is embarrassing, sinful, immoral and, in general, “unladylike.” The second reason is that most citizens of New York — including police officers — have no idea that it is perfectly legal for a lady to bare her breasts in public.

Case in point: Two years ago, a 27-year old New Yorker, Jill Coccaro took a walk without covering her breasts. She was arrested, taken for a psychiatric exam, and thrown in jail for 12 hours. Finally, after someone in the District Attorney’s office realized what had happened, she was released and told no charges would be pressed. In turn, Jill sued the city and, just recently, received a $29,000 settlement.

Don’t try this outside of New York! Anywhere else in the country you will likely have to pay dearly for your ‘nature walk.’

The questions this issues raise are: Is someone being victimized by a pair of breasts? Is a lady endangering anyone’s life or destroying anyone’s property by shedding shirt and bra? These are, of course, rhetorical questions and the answer is: course not! So if no one or nothing is damaged by a pair of exposed breasts, why should it be illegal anywhere for a lady to walk around with her breasts exposed. Might this be frowned upon by those who object to the practice, yes! Might a topless lady be subjected to social castigation, certainly! A topless lady will certainly not be allowed in many places of business and that’s fine; but to be incarcerated and fined for exposing your breasts — that’s ludicrous.

Our legal system is supposed to protect us against people who want to, or in some cases unintentionally do, harm our persons or our property; the legal system should not be misused to enforce social taboos! There are many things I don’t like to see — and I’m sure there are many things you don’t like to see; some of these things may just upset you and some may deeply offend you — but should they all — or any of them — be made illegal?

In this case, we’re talking about the human body. Hey, everyone has one and they all basically look alike except for gender differences. If you don’t like to look at a naked or partially naked human body, YOU may be the one with the problem and if you teach your children that they should be ashamed of their body you’re passing that problem on to the next generation.

On your next vacation, I would suggest a week in a naturist facility or, as some call it, a nudist camp; by the end of the week you will have an entirely new perspective.

Links:

Houston Chronicle: Topless woman accepts $29,000 in NY settlement

Beloit Daily News Editorial: EDITORIAL: Exercising ‘right’ to be indecent

From the blogosphere:

Humor in Verse: You have nothing to loose except your bra-strings

Tim Worstall: Phoenix Feeley (Jill Coccaro)

My first Post

Hi, this will be my blog about illegal activities and connected things. It just come out to my mind this new year`s day. Well first i thought of the word Illegal Logger and to sound funny this will be Illegal Blogger. Ha ha ha.Happy New Year to All.
watch out for my posts.!
-illegal blogger